Ethical Analysis · Proposed Rule · 28 CFR Part 77 · Docket OAG199

THE FOX
GUARDS
THE HEN HOUSE

The DOJ's proposed rule grants the Attorney General the right to review every ethics complaint filed against her own attorneys — and to order state bars to stand down until that review is complete. The same office being investigated decides whether the investigation proceeds.
Complaint Filed
Citizen or court files ethics complaint against DOJ attorney with state bar
AG Claims "First Review"
Attorney General intercepts. Orders state bar to suspend its investigation
State Bar Sidelined
Independent oversight blocked. If bar refuses, DOJ takes "appropriate action" to stop it
§77.5(b): "the Department shall take appropriate action to prevent the bar disciplinary authorities from interfering with the Attorney General's review"

WHO IS ACCUSED
DOJ attorneys — including senior officials and career prosecutors — acting under the authority and direction of the Attorney General
← ⚠️ →
Attorney General
Supervises accused attorneys AND controls the review process
← ⚠️ →
WHO INVESTIGATES
OPR — the Office of Professional Responsibility — which reports directly to, and is supervised by, the Attorney General

#The ChargeThe Legal Anchor
I
Inversion of the McDade Amendment
Congress passed 28 U.S.C. 530B to make DOJ attorneys subject to state bars — not to give the AG authority to suspend state bar oversight when it becomes inconvenient
28 U.S.C. 530B(a) "An attorney for the Government shall be subject to State laws and rules… to the same extent and in the same manner as other attorneys"
II
Self-Policing Is Not Policing
OPR reports to the AG. Allowing the AG's own office to determine whether the AG's own attorneys committed misconduct eliminates the independence that makes discipline meaningful
ABA Model Rule 8.5 A lawyer is subject to the disciplinary authority of each jurisdiction where admitted or practicing — not the authority of their employer
III
Threatening Independent Bodies
§77.5(b) explicitly authorizes DOJ to take "appropriate action" against state bars that refuse to stand down. This is coercion of independent constitutional actors, not regulation
Supremacy Clause Risk McCulloch v. Maryland applies to federal activities — but not as a blank check to preempt state bar oversight Congress itself authorized
IV
Criminalizing Accountability as "Weaponization"
The rule frames independent ethics complaints as political attacks. Labeling legitimate oversight a weapon is a rhetorical device to pre-discredit any complainant before review begins
Framing Alert Section D of the rule calls bar complaints "weaponization." The only prior use of this framing: EO 14147, which targets DOJ's political opponents

Before: Independent Oversight
⚖️State bars investigate DOJ attorney ethics complaints independently
🏛️OPR and state bars operate in parallel — checks on each other
👤Complainants (citizens, judges, opposing counsel) have a direct path to a neutral body
📋State bar can suspend or disbar a federal prosecutor who crosses the line
After: Captured Oversight
🛑AG intercepts every complaint before state bar can act
⛓️State bars must wait for the accused's employer to finish reviewing the accused
🔇DOJ can withhold non-public information from parallel bar investigations indefinitely
Bars that refuse face active DOJ opposition — chilling all future oversight
⏰ Time Remaining to Comment
Midnight Apr 6 Eastern · 9 PM Apr 6 Pacific
calculating...
Editorial Verdict
"A government that cannot be disciplined is no longer governed by law. This rule does not protect ethical standards — it protects the powerful from them."
⏳ Comment Period Closes · April 6, 2026
Let the DOJ know what you think
This is not a petition. This is the Administrative Procedure Act — the DOJ must read and respond to every substantive objection before this rule can become law.
Courts across the country have struck down federal rules because agencies ignored public comments. Your written objection enters the official legal record, even if anonymous, and can be cited in any court challenge. Once April 6th passes, this door closes.
✂ Ready-to-Submit Comment — Copy & Paste
Submit Your Comment Now regulations.gov · Docket OAG199 · DOJ-OAG-2026-0001-0001
You may submit as an Individual, as an Organization, or Anonymously · Complete reCAPTCHA · Click Submit Comment
📋 How to Submit in 4 Steps
  1. 1️⃣ Tap Copy Text above to copy the comment to your clipboard
  2. 2️⃣ Tap Submit Your Comment Now below — regulations.gov opens in a new tab
  3. 3️⃣ Tap the comment box where it says "Start typing comment here..." to place your cursor, then paste — the character counter should drop from 5000 to around ~3490 ✅
  4. 4️⃣ Choose your identity — Individual, Organization, or Anonymous — complete the reCAPTCHA, and tap Submit Comment
📄
The Proposed Rule — Full Federal Register Text
28 CFR Part 77 · Docket OAG199 · Published March 5, 2026 · Read the rule itself before you oppose it
regulations.gov/document/DOJ-OAG-2026-0001-0001
⚖️
The Administrative Procedure Act — Full Text
5 U.S.C. §§ 551–559 · The law that makes your comment a legal record and requires the DOJ to respond to substantive objections before finalizing any rule
law.cornell.edu · 5 U.S.C. Chapter 5, Subchapter II
CC BY
Moral Fiber Media · Licensed under CC BY 4.0 · Share and adapt freely with attribution · moralfibermedia.com